Historical sources

1. The later 1990s and early 2000s Internet bulletin boards and USENET groups are important historical sources.

2. Regular mail intercepted by various actors.

Unfortunately, the documents were formerly collected for some purposes, but now they have increasingly disappeared off the web, including at backup sources.

On another note, at least this material is available:

http://www.prisoncensorship.info/archive/etext/wim/wyl/socialdem.html

http://www.prisoncensorship.info/archive/etext/agitation/iraq/revisionistoccupation.html

Where we are now: resummarizing the JDPON

Harvard has held a whirlwind of seminars this past week. I even found myself in a middle-of-the-road position on a topic of major importance handled in two talks. Perhaps the most important item touched on whether the United $tates should run India and India run the United $tates, because that way government would be more impartial.

The problem with the idea is that as it stands now, Indians do not have the information and vice-versa. So foreign observers could be impartial but uninformed.

Readers will recall that MIM held we need a “re-civilization” or “de-lousing” stage in the rich countries, before material in those countries would exist to build socialism. We specifically argued that after World War II, Stalin saw to reparations from Germany and the Soviet Union officially did not say that even the Soviet-occupied zone was building socialism. Most offered the explanation that the influence of Nazi ideology was too deep. MIM offered an economic explanation why there was no basis for building socialism in Germany.

I point this out at this time because of an increasing likelihood that I will be drawn into high-level elite conflicts on a Liberal basis, because of highly contingent historical events some are calling coincidences, others something else. My motivations will come under question, which is why it is important that the international united front recall the overall picture.

What we have seen in the past two years of class struggle is that the international united front can make incremental gains in the de-lousing struggle, without direct control of the imperialist state. Whatever happens with a few individuals in the rich countries lacking a real proletariat to aid the international struggle, this should not be forgotten.

It can be said a goal of this stage of incremental struggle is to transfer information to India (as a metaphor for the whole Third World) about its globalizing dominator. We have talked about how without organization to make the question of surplus-value concrete across nations, there can be only Titoism. Tito-ism in old economics language is rooted in provincial rent-seeking.

In the United $tates we have Alaskans rich because of their oil. This is something that brings home the Titoism question for Amerikans. Islam is trying to handle this question as well be restributing oil wealth through Islamic channels.

When the international proletariat finally gets a handle on the global economy, it will be able to dominate global politics. Right now the proletarian hand is on the elephant, but India is not ready to run the United $tates.

December 4

I’ll try to clarify something December 4.

Coercion

There is a difference between capitalist or Liberal coercion and pre-capitalist coercion. The coercion of the oppressor in my situation was outlawed in the French Revolution of 1789.

For the same reasons, the Palestinians are not at the negotiating table yet. There are preconditions to being at a Liberal negotiations table. Slavery and feudalism have to be smashed first.

I would say this current round of discussion is a delaying tactic.

Mideast update and doubts on one-stage revolution

[This is another lousy article with between-the-lines meaning.]

Netanyahu favors a one-stage Trotskyist revolution. I would ask him to consider that the Arabs under the best of circumstances have some self-interest in opposing carbon taxes.

In Maoist terminology, we would say I’m receiving criticism as “right opportunist.” It seems to me very hard or “vexing” as one female writer put it to sort out how not to reward lynching. Others are more “hopeful” and for some time I have been offered psychological theories why I have adopted what seems to them as a right opportunist course.

In the latest speculations, I would say there are two more considerations. I find it highly unlikely that my family members were involved in 1989-1991 events and that is important. However, if it turned out that family members encouraged Obama to run in 2008, that would be another can of worms.

I do not want blame for the lack of transparency in U.$. government that existed since before I was born. However, in the latest speculations I have to put myelf in different shoes than usual and I have not specialized in that kind of footwear. I would hope that Dennis Blair or my family members if they were involved somehow would squash the latest speculations. Again, I can’t take the blame for what I don’t know about covert intelligence activity or even Democratic Party activism.

I realize I’m probably getting some indirect information on this question at Harvard. It’s been helpful to hear people think out loud.

There are always risks in delays. From what I am accustomed to, it would be better to get serious and not take the risks of various new cans of worms.

Many apologies

I just realized this morning what Amerikan elites have been talking about. I was thinking hard about the EU and Mideast.

Not a mystery we want to have

The MOSSAD took offense to my last mention of them, of course. If my comrades were paying attention, they would have noticed something the MOSSAD just did caused by my ex-comrades.

I’m under intense scrutiny because of the rape fabrication and because the website went down. Because people are not going to take this all at a straight-on-my-verbal-say-so, they are going to look into documents. And what they are going to find is two different contexts in which an ex-comrade is mentioned as MOSSAD.

Now what if the ex-comrade was not MOSSAD, but now as part of a due diligence investigation MOSSAD is being mentioned in the same breath as rape fabrications, neo-Nazis and the shutdown of the world’s most powerful anti-Amerikkkan website? Do you think you would resent it if you were MOSSAD? What do you think you might do to catch my attention?

And do you think the MOSSAD is the only one going to have doubts? How do you think this looks to the international proletariat, after all the warnings we gave it? It looks like we have no ability to deliver even clean diplomatic cards, and the kicker is that the two sides reinforce each other.

The most obvious beneficiary of all this was the Democratic Party, as I predicted in “What’s New?” months in advance. It looks like the Democratic Party cannot leave campaign mode to enter governance mode, in which truth matters if not to U.$. voters, then to other significant actors in the world, on both sides, the imperialists and the proletariat.

Truth matters. Reality matters. People outside Hollywood, outside Amerikkka and even outside a couple putrid Internet discussion boards (which endorsed Obama) matter.

Comment/ message reading policy

I don’t read messages or comments here. You have to mail me if you know my email.

The reason for that is that I found myself wasting time sorting through too many threats when I have to do work. It’s the same underlying reasoning I pushed to shut down a friendly forum, when it was polluted by my lynchers’ associates and those creating an appearance of threatening them.

Saudi bombing of Yemen

[This is another horrible article with Aesopian content.]

Regarding the Saudi bombing of Yemen, my ex-comrades are letting the bourgeois press lead the way, because of their racist standards of un-reasoning.

Today, the “Financial Times” is hitting the mark, hard, while my ex-comrades f* up and try to drag the revolution backwards. It confirms what I just said about Europe standing firmer. Here we are being made to look stupid, where if ever there was a case for saying to write off the imperialist country “Left,” if ever there was a moment justifying Islamic radicalism and exclusively Islamic radicalism, now is that moment. The Che-Libbers just can’t figure it out. It means that intelligent Leftism cannot be transmitted and is therefore worthless. Imperialist Leftism’s secular properties were supposed to be valued. Now we have the upper ranks of the capitalist class figuring things out and the Muslims’ figuring things out while Amerikan “Leftists” take pride in their perversely racist resistance to truth.

My ex-comrades have been told by various international sources why they are wrong. They don’t recognize it or they are bribed. Undoubtedly it’s a combination of both.

I have always opposed Aesopian writing, which is not surprising given that MIM’s readers were so heavily prisoners and speakers of English as a second language. Here I am getting a double-whammy, once because of stories spread and screwed up by ex-comrades involved with the lynching and once by the government media’s leakage of Aesopian racism to reinforce twisted conceptions of struggle.

The revolutionaryleft.com (“Che-Libs”) and RCP=CIA are actively in the way of revolution.

COINTELPRO update

Hal Turner turned up in northjersey.com newstories. The stories demonstrate that COINTELPRO-style confusion is still spread by the FBI in this modern day.

Hal Turner was a deep cover agent, trained by the FBI in racism and anti-Semitism. He is now reportedly in trouble in court for death threats against federal judges.

“‘I was not some street snitch,’ Turner said in one of several lengthy interviews at the Hudson County Jail, where he was kept until the terms of his bail were worked out in October — terms that prevented him from talking to reporters after his release. ‘I was a deep undercover intelligence operative.’”

Note:

http://www.northjersey.com/news/Records_show_feds_used_ultra-right_radio_host_for_years.html