Daily update

1. In reply to Kristof, there was genocide before the existence of fascism. Today in the united $tates, Arabs and Islam occupy the bottom according to surveys.

Fascism requires the monopoly stage of capitalism seen in rich countries.

Suggesting a Western solution to Rwanda is like watching Japanese, Italian and German troops land in I$ratine. No doubt there is a serious problem more important than the pure numbers involved, but when one reaches that point, one should realize there is something wrong.

2. Yeah, Reagan played football, maybe without a helmet. Now we have Mathematical Application Deficiency Disease (MADD).

Maybe he made some brave bourgeois decisions: hat’s off to him.

More extortion

The “New York Times” has taken part in another extortion plot involving lynching, with another white female.

A persyn representing herself as the sister of my lyncher (perhaps with the point of demonstrating knowledge of my diaries) but without ever naming my lyncher by name introduced herself to me at a bar in NY when I was reporting about approaches from Satanists and Clinton supporters. She spoke in Aesopian language the whole time with knowledge of my diaries. She rattled off recent things I had said on class.

The National Public Radio is also taking part.

It is very clear that the Democrats subsist on lynching as a regular tactic. No doubt the reason Charles Blow says Obama is back is this latest extortion plot.

This plot involves a reputed professional working for a Catholic organization.

The Obama administration and “New York Times” are now especially out in the open undermining Mideast diplomacy.

In very recent years, the enemy has tried to add in other females that are not white into the lynching repertoire, but without luck, because they were too late. In general the strategy has been to criminalize my every contact with white females.

Identity theft, hoaxes and post-hoc reasoning

So far in this period of struggle since 2006, I’ve uncovered two identity thefts, one of which I reported to authorities and one of which I reported not the theft itself but the circumstances to a friend. The remarks of the counter-terrorism official John Brennan have added cyberwarfare and identity theft into the brew.

As I explained back in 2006, when authorities take your private information, it is at risk for theft, possession by the mafia for instance. I’ve argued many times that under capitalism we want to defend privacy. On the other hand, we want government accountability, and so far, I’ve gotten none.

I’ve had many, many Aesopian references from people that believe that my lynching is part of the royal flush of the intelligence world where someone really scored a very difficult hit. On the other hand, even the people making these references are not directly helpful to my cause. No matter how one slices it however, the appearance of a real world third party infiltration gambit has been used as part of a hoax at the very least — a criminal conspiracy.

I prefer the hoax theory myself, because it’s easier to pull off than what has been represented to me. Carrying out a trigger action is easy, but getting the second leg at the level I’m told the second leg of an interlocking scandal happened is extremely difficult.

It’s entirely possible to run a trigger action and then create a hoax based on identity thefts for everything else. The political appearance and effect would be the same.

Regarding post-hoc reasoning, another comment by Brennan has me pointing out the following, which is that the intelligence community as constituted is involved in post-hoc production because there is no official agenda. Usually the U.$. boss is a pragmatic politician. It’s not really post hoc for a Republican to complain about the Christmas Bomber getting Miranda rights, because Republicans have been on record regarding that many times since 9/11. (I do understand some subtle political messages in that conversation.) If Republican reasoning is post-hoc, it could be on account of some ineptitude at the origins of the question.

The benefit of MIM Thought, is that people know where it is coming from and its motivations are less apt to shift from day-to-day and individual-to-individual. The idea of principal contradiction between imperialism and oppressed nations is both a statement about reality and an agenda. Many others in the Anglo-Saxon world do not have that and thus are free to shift from day-to-day on a post-hoc basis, including in the intelligence community.

MIM’s ease-of-accountability is especially important prior to 9/11, because MIM is now claiming that the motivations of others is suspect in 9/11 context. Bush wanted the Iraq War and he got it. Others wanted the Afghanistan war before 9/11 and they got their wish too. Hence, when Matlock criticizes “incompetence” regarding 9/11, we prefer to say that the politicians competently started two wars. The charge of “incompetence” aside from being individualist assumes that some individuals did not want the results they got.

If Nancy Pelosi is correct that Bush handed Obama a bunch of bad cards that bespeaks a certain kind of competence. The leaders of the Republican Party may be much more intelligent than the Republican voters. It’s not necessary to deny Obama when he says that 190 terrorists went to prison under Clinton and Bush with non-Gitmo style processing. Another example is Clare Short. It takes a certain kind of competence to get a country into a war amidst many doubts, so hand it to Blair. Competent warmongering and incompetent peace-making could be difficult to separate.

Individualism lends itself to post-hoc reasoning, because patterns of motivation can change frequently thus making it impossible to be wrong. MIM can question the motivations of 9/11 related struggles without being post-hoc or targeting individual politicians on a fabrication-of-the-day basis because we made a choice on the principal contradiction and agenda.

Photographs and 9/11

When it comes to the Arabs we always hear that they play both sides, that their financing needs to be disrupted and their charities shut down. According to even the movies, Amerikan star role players disinform the Arabs and set up cells to carry out military actions then mistaken as recruiting signals by real militants. Me? Sometimes I think action has a way of cutting through these things and revealing life to be simpler. But let it not be said the CIA does not disinform people, that false information does not make its way to U.$. citizens from foreign media etc.

Thanks to the weird way life works over here, I’ve been told about two Arabs in connection to 9/11.

In understanding 9/11, it’s important to pay attention to photographs.

Note:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,670196,00.html

Proposals for a new president

I have made some proposals about how the United $tates could make internal political deals to put in a Clarence Thomas, Jackson, Holder or Wilder as president. I have done this because every day that this current fascist regime stays in power is a reward for lynching and star court behavior.

I have not asked for anything of a deal to go into office.

A sudden interest in extramarital affairs

Paula Jones, Gennifer Flowers and Monica Lewinsky — are the Democrats suddenly running people out of campaigns on these issues? Well, but the timing of the psychological sub-reformist argument is a little off.

Daily update

First we have the week in review.

I complained about etext.org again; the media and some countries supported me; I snarled at the federal government and Obama took the opportunity to weaken Palestinian cards. In tandem, the “New York Times” had multiple desperate snits. That’s where we are now with the “New York Times” eating up lynching in a desperate bid to save the Democrats.

It’s not likely that Palestinians are unaware of what is going on, given Al Qaeda cells on Palestinian territory.

The only thing the Democrats are going to be able to do is show people how lacking seriousness they are in anything they do.

Putin said the following; “‘You cannot turn into ‘Mr. Promises,’ who makes promises just to pull the wool over people’s eyes, to break into positions of power, and then goes about solving his own personal problems without thinking about fulfilling your promises.’” “Personal problems” is how the RCP=CIA termed my lynching that Obama used. There had to be some explanation in the interim years leading up to the recent climax of struggle.

Putin also paraphrased Mao on the importance of the correct line while simultaneously rubbing in that in his speeches he was being more Liberal than what the United $tates is practicing at the moment.

Obama stupidly promised to close Gitmo AND simultaneously used the lynching card instead of uncovering it in exchange for nothing when I advised. Now the desperate Democrats try to take that out of my hide. As usual, being unprincipled does have consequences.

Notes:
1. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/06/world/europe/06briefs-PUTINWARNSHI_BRF.html
2. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/05/AR2010020501841.html

A tale of robots: Daily update

1. “The drones can carry out surveillance – what the RAF describe as a ’staring eye’ – of the battlefield around the clock, far longer than conventional manned aircraft.”

The Brits are referring to the Amerikans they copy with flying robots over Afghanistan, but they could also be talking about the Obamautons’ priorities — the use of lynching to further war.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/feb/07/raf-drones-afghanistan

2. Tony Blair cabinet officer Clare Short traded her support for the Iraq War for the Palestine “Road Map” and other items. She is now resigning her last post over the Iraq War.

“‘Loyalty is a good quality,’ she says, ‘but loyalty to something that’s wrong is not good.’ Moreover, she argues, loyalty to a party as she understands it no longer exists.”

Also,
“‘I WISH he [Tony Blair--ed.] hadn’t conned me. I WISH he’d really meant it, but goodness knows, he is persuasive – and you DON’T want, in the teeth of a war, to believe your prime minister is simply manipulating you.’”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/feb/06/clare-short-iraq-chilcot-inquiry

3. It’s hard to tell, but maybe the West passed over another overture. The “Times Online” says Iran started upgrading nuclear fuel processing.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article7018527.ece

No Aesopian deals

I need to simplify in case there is any worry out there about ambiguity.

1. I will not make any Aesopian deals with my government-media at this point.

2. I see myself as carrying out the recivilizing stage of struggle. Hence, I will not make an open deal skipping to the second stage, which is actually running for office. If there is no first stage, there is no second.

For those who have followed things in Aesopian terms, you’ve seen a lot of Aesopian offers to me as a persyn, none of which have been delivered on over years of time. Even if in some principle it would be possible to do first and second stage deals simultaneously on paper, I would not believe it. What would be needed, what the crypto-Trots are trying to talk me into is an Aesopian deal skipping to the second stage, when I would not even accept a simultaneous Aesopian deal for the second stage after a written first stage.

If my position is too hardline for anyone out there in the Third World, I apologize. I don’t put much stock in the Liberal capital I’ve been handed and I believe the class struggle should proceed and Asian-unAmerikkkans should take another crack at things later.

I saw them pass on Suu Kyi and I know they care about her.

In principle, I would horsetrade with a country in the international united front, but I can’t think of any deal that needs to be made.

Anyone who follows what I have said the last 15 years knows I’m in character. I’m not going to be intimidated by a lynchmob media or politicians who make accusations before an investigation. At the moment, what I say seems like too much of a rule change for the system to bear.

The reason I’ve never been given anything in writing in 20 years is that my attackers knew it was something to be used in a campaign in which there would be either total success through their silence or a horse-trade. However, there is not going to be any reward for lynching from me.

No bad deed goes unrewarded

A curious silence enveloped the left-wing of parasitism when the Human Rights Watch released a report on atrocities against lesbians and gays in Iraq. “They Want Us Exterminated” came out in August 2009 and MIM published on it with no responsible reply from the liberal Democrat media.

It’s obvious why there was no response: the actors involved have contacts with the Shia majority government. That includes the Obama administration which would retain blame.

The Human Rights Watch is not a Maoist group. It is an organization usually quoted at length in the liberal media. One of the culprits HRW targets — and MIM has no evidence from direct investigation itself — is the Mahdi Army.

Not a Maoist source at all, the Wikipedia says the following about the Mahdi Army:

“The Mahdi Army, also known as the Mahdi Militia or Jaish al Mahdi (Arabic جيش المهدي), is an Iraqi paramilitary force created by the Iraqi Shi’ite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr in June 2003.

The group rose to international prominence on April 4, 2004 when it spearheaded the first major armed confrontation against the U.S.-led occupation forces in Iraq from the Shi’ite community in an uprising that followed the banning of al-Sadr’s newspaper and attempts to arrest him, and lasted until a truce on June 6.”

In other words, the Mahdi Army did not exist until the U.$. invasion of Iraq.

Mystery solved — the curious silence is a result of bad judgment at the “New York Times.” The same people who bought Clinton on weapons of mass destruction, who bought the 9/11 story contributed to the Iraq War which created the Mahdi Army. However, listening to the “New York Times” one would think “They Want Us Exterminated” applies to Amerikan LGBT in the U.S. military.

Attention to the principal contradiction between imperialism and the oppressed nations has done more to advance gender liberation in the last 100 years than focus on gender directly which usually ends up in nationalist exercises as we see in the “New York Times” now. To refute this argument the “New York Times” would have to say HRW was exaggerating or guilty of Islamophobia: don’t hold your breath.