Archive for December, 2009

Same ‘ole lesson in December

December 30, 2009

Once again we saw in December the ‘ole boys’ network (OBN) demonstrate its stupidity and lack of credibility — via the same ‘ole ways. The OBN sought to blame me for its own hydra-headedness, its desire to have things more than both ways while hiding behind immature masks.

Once again my graciousness was taken as weakness and once again the OBN failed as a result to investigate its own stupidity. The result was the same ‘ole potato-chip-eating racism.

There is a reason for accountability, but the OBN can’t figure it out. There is no intelligent persyn in the world that wants to make deals with immature people hiding behind masks, trying to have things several different ways. The overuse of masks is so extensive, there is no way that the OBN itself could tell anyone what the OBN was doing at any given moment.

It’s an acceptance of muddle-through racism and stupidity when many members of the OBN won’t be able to say themselves what is going on.

The British had a chance to cut through the bullshit at any point in the last few months, but decided to have-it-both-ways. To influence the elections coming up in a few months, one would have to act now.

Relief

December 22, 2009

I am pleased to announce that for once I have good news. A young female I never saw before followed me into two different places in three days. That was hard to do because they are places neither of which I had gone to in months and they are far apart. However, today I saw her with someone else, which makes me think she is mature enough to be a grad student or a reporter not attempting to make a scene in some kind of gotcha.

I was studying ESPN aptly on television when my pursuer sat between me and the TV. Happily I have now learned that Kobe was voted player of the decade, that Sullinger is the high school phenom of the year and that Shaq and Lebron James are only +5 so far when on the court at the same time.

While we are on the subject of good news, some of you our readers have carried out a peaceful retaliation for an injustice against me. Thank you. I do realize I am not alone; even though, communists are not popular here.

Again, the law please

December 21, 2009

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 19
§ 371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

“If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.”

Source:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000371—-000-.html

Identity theft: Facebook, Twitter, youtube etc.

December 21, 2009

I do not have anything I put up on Facebook. The old MIM videos of youtube were not by me and I don’t use Twitter at all; nor have I consented to being involved with Twitter.

I’m just a writer who uses old-fashioned black-and-white text.

There are those who have attacked my Internet network repeatedly. I have been threatened with release of pornographic videos taking advantage of a camera in my laptop that was hijacked across a network.

The pig collaborators and the government pushing spy mania have created this atmosphere, just as they have conducted leaks against me for the purpose of stirring up further racial hatred.

P.S. If you are cutting and pasting from this blog to Twitter or other new media, I am not objecting necessarily. I’m just saying I’m not responsible.

Threats and RICO

December 20, 2009
  • See also, “The Cuba Non-Story and Gitmo”
  • See also, “Attention Prosecutors”

    I reiterate that some activity by judges and lawyers also comes under RICO. There is nothing saying that a conspiracy cannot include a political operative, lawyer and judge, who ends up impeached under RICO.

    I understand the threats against me and more importantly I know exactly why they have no basis but politics. I urge onlookers not to be intimidated by any legal threats against me.

  • Relative media coverage

    December 20, 2009

    One of the problems we are having with breaking the lynching story is that the U.$. papers are based in big cities selling to Democrats. These papers are presumed to know me better and have the inside poop.

    Yet, anyone studying the media can see that there is only one so far that even attempted on an Aesopian basis to show what the question is, and that is the British “Guardian.” This is all the funnier, because even the “Guardian” knows me on a persynal basis, in that over 50 columns there came from Mark Weisbrot, who made a point of stopping by to say he was going to treat me as “dangerous” from there on for “recruiting all the best people.” Weisbrot was/is with the Gus Hall “Communist Party” that never saw through phony Soviet communism.

    In other words, we have only varying degrees of lynching in the media. Not one paper has attempted openly to work the angle of how building scandals works, and instead all have produced gossip along the lines of my lyncher’s wishes. I have considerable doubt whether most papers even understand the mechanisms involved, not just from my case, but previous ones.

    That’s to leave out that none show any understanding of how to produce comparative social history. The reason for that is the dominance of the lynching paradigm in the Pornograhic Spectacle Machine. It’s almost as if the PSM has to ASSUME I am a high-ranking government official to even know what to do.

    My point is that by now, this issue has gone on long enough that we can presume whatever initial advantages various papers might have had in covering me, things have moved along since. For example, I have seen material in “Newsweek” not referenced elsewhere yet, this despite the fact that MSNBC is contractually involved with one of my professional detractors.

    More Axelrod foreign policy

    December 20, 2009

    The bullshit never stops.

    “The Times of London reported earlier this week that week that intelligence documents they had obtained showed Iran had been working on a nuclear trigger. Ahmadinejad said the documents were, ‘fabricated papers issued by the American Government’. Axelrod called Ahmadinejad’s allegation ‘nonsense’.”

    Axelrod is not in the State Department or Pentagon. He’s just another spin-meister.

    I have noted that Mullen says Iran may be trying to run out the clock. We have entered a difficult phase, because some may feel there is some kind of deal in place, but I as yet do not see one.

    Note:
    http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2009/12/axelrod-to-iran-there-will-be-consequences-.html

    “Think for yourself”: a.k.a. invent racist standards on the fly

    December 20, 2009

    Regarding my ex-comrades’ claims — it’s always useful to accept them at face-value and see what they mean in principle. Leaving aside the sexual rumors spread by the CIA and casually accepted by people working with Kerry and Obama — duh, the government — what remains?

    Take their factually untrue and out-of-context assertions as true at face-value. You won’t find anything in Marx, Lenin or Mao opposing them. In other words, these were racist standards invented on the fly to interfere with the MIM’s work.

    In contrast, those of us still adhering to MIM principles have been guided by the same standards all along. It’s an example of why it is impossible to ever hold “pragmatists” accountable — almost by definition.

    Rape fabrication is not “dissent”

    December 20, 2009

    They called it “Martha Nussbaum democracy,” here at a recent Harvard conference as another name for “productive democracy” to replace “social democracy.” Participants played ole’ boys’ network games substituting Martha Nussbaum for “dissent.” The problem is that I am not a government official and never have been. No one is “dissenting” against me yet.

    Even at the nitty-grittiest level of my situation, I am talking about my complaints against government officials. Yes, the people involved in manufacturing and distributing rape fabrications are government officials, not me. However, the Democratic Party serving media does not care: it’s who pays the subscriptions.

    What it really comes down to is how much the Democratic Party has always seen MIM as a threat. Additionally there is the stupidity of the left-wing of parasitism, that even though it knew full well that the CIA was following the situation as early as 2005, it collaborated with the CIA in continuing to spread rumors it had no possibility of getting away with.

    Federal court dismisses FOIA

    December 20, 2009

    On December 18, the Boston branch of U.S. Federal Court dismissed our FOIA from 2007 asking for Defense Department documents on MIM.

    The Defense Department did not oppose the FOIA, only wrote a vacuous letter and never delivered. By their own published rules, the DoD is supposed to release FOIAs within 10 days.

    The Federal Court’s decision proved that the FOIA is not worth the paper it is written on. The Court gave no reason for that decision but said the complaint against the Bank of America was vague.

    We had already explained that the DoD FOIA was the cornerstone of our complaint and that we were entitled to its results before the Bank of America’s assignees sued me in 2009.

    The defeat in the Boston branch of federal court does not end MIM’s fight for FOIA documents and an end to leak-slanders.

    See also the advertising intimidation game Bank of America played